Wednesday, September 26, 2018

FAQ

What does CORE stand for?

Cultivating Organizational Responsiveness and Equity


What is CORE?

CORE is a group of San Francisco Connections staff of all levels who meet monthly to discuss issues pertaining to racial equity and develop action strategies for our program within the larger Seneca agency. Our mission centers around creating and equitable and inclusive workplace culture and environment. Site Team Meetings are held every second and fourth Thursday from 10:00 to 12:00pm at 45 Farallones, San Francisco.


What is the Mission of CORE?

The C.O.R.E. team is a body of Seneca employees with representation across management and direct care staff workers within San Francisco Connections that continuously assess organizational health on an individual and program level.


Why does San Francisco have a CORE team?


What types of things does the CORE team work on?

  • Developing and implementing racial equity staff development training (implicit bias, etc.)
  • Developing and implementing policy and practices for addressing microaggressions within our workplace
  • Coordinate facilitation and generate subject matter for Community Process Group

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

How to Get Involved

  1. Connect with a representative
    • Get informed about what CORE is working on
    • Learn what CORE members do
    • Find out how to join
  2. Join the CORE team **
    • Stay tuned for open membership periods
    • Talk to a representative to see if there's an opening
  3. Bring an issue to a representative or fill out our outreach form
    • We're always open to taking on new DEI concerns
    • We can help take action when microaggressions are identified
  4. Participate in Community Process Group
    • You can suggest a topic for discussion OR
    • You can facilitate a group yourself!
** What makes someone a good fit? We are looking for folks who are meeting their basic job expectations (if you have questions about what that means please check in with your supervisor), are enthusiastic about being part of a group that is committed to the Seneca values and the direction that SF Connections is taking as a leader in the agency. New members are asked to make at least a one year commitment. 

So, if all of that sounds groovy and you think “I’m interested in being a part of this team.” Then the question is how does that happen?

Step 1: Take some time to think about what it would look like to add this to your already busy life (seriously, this is a big commitment). If after that, you feel confident about wanting to join the team move to Step 2.

Step 2: Talk with your supervisor about your interest in this project. She/he may have additional questions for you about the two days of thinking that you have done.

Step 3: Think about the following questions in preparation for your first meeting with the team:
  • What interests you about being a part of this team? 
  • How would you persuade your peers to embrace the changes developed by the team?
  • What part(s) of the change initiative stands out to you and why?
  • What do you see as the change process that Connections need in order to enact the Change Initiative?

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

CORE: A Historical Perspective

The SF Connections CORE Team was created as part of the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI) Workforce Excellence Project. In 2014, SF Connections joined the SF Human Services Agency in a implementing the project which was designed to inform ongoing efforts to improve climate and culture in our agency. A baseline survey was administered in 2014 to then-staff members at SF Connections.  The results of that survey, the Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment (COHA), helped identify and target key organizational climate and culture, as well as organizational functioning areas. Using the information from the survey, SF Connections developed a strategic plan, called the Organizational Intervention, to implement three change initiatives. The change initiatives informed by the COHA survey centered on the following three main areas:
  • Building and Retaining staff diversity 
  • Inclusive workplace practices, policies, culture and environment 
  • Culturally accountable and culturally responsive practices and policies 
The CORE Team was then created to address the workforce strengths and barriers to implementation, and finally to implement SF Connections' Change Initiative. The team acts as the driver and primary decision maker for determining and implementing the actions steps of the project through a process of engagement in continuous assessment. The team is always eliciting feedback and ideas as part of our process and incorporates this into the on-going implementation efforts. The team is made up of folks representing a range of programs and includes a mix of management and staff.

The official NCWWI project ran for a period of three years, after which a follow up COHA survey was administered to SF Connections staff. The CORE team decided to continue our work on the organizational health of SFC beyond the end of the project and we are still working to address our original as well as newly-identified change initiatives today.

What is the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI)?

The purpose of NCWWI is to increase child welfare practice effectiveness through diverse partnerships that focus on workforce systems development, organizational interventions, and change leadership, using data-driven capacity building, education, and professional development. NCWWI’s workforce development activities promote:
  • Learning: Fostering continuous learning that is interactive, reflective and relevant
  • Leading: Cultivating diverse leadership at multiple levels within child welfare systems
  • Changing: Supporting change through workforce development and organizational capacity building

NCWWI Vision

Innovative organizational leadership, high performing staff, and diverse partners prepared and committed to pursue excellence and sustainable systems change in service of optimal outcomes for children, youth and families.

CORE Team Principles and Values

The CORE Team manifests a set of values about worker empowerment and organizational culture. Values then translate into specific principles guiding the functioning and structure of CORE Team. The Organizational Intervention is guided by the following principles:
  • Create organizational change through solution-focused discussions and subsequent actions using a team approach for the benefit of the entire agency. 
  • Inspire a learning organization committed to improved practices and functioning. 
  • Use inquiry-based communication to encourage open participation and communication by the team. 
  • Empower staff from all site levels to improve their site for the benefit of all individual site members. 
  • Use strengths-focused interventions. 
  • Embody a culturally-responsive approach. 
  • Connect the change initiative to the agency’s mission, values, and practice model. 
  • Share tasks and activities among the CORE Team membership to achieve Organizational Intervention goals. 
  • Use comprehensive, incremental and strategic implementations for long-term sustainability. 
  • Employ strategic approaches based upon careful assessment of the current situation. 
The CORE Team embodies a commitment to set high standards, see the big picture; understand the change initiative, and the implementation impact on the day-to-day work of child welfare staff.

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Meet the Members

Name
Title
Program
Amy Kirsztajn
Director
SF Connections
Brittany Nielsen
Mobile Counselor
MRT/ISS
Cara Prehn
Therapy Supervisor
Clinical Services
Ezekiel Bronstein
Therapist
DBT
Kelsey Scott
Program Assistant / HIS
Admin
Krista Hutchens
Linkage Clinician
Probation
Kijafa Idalliah
Community Innovation Manager
Connections
Leah Hopson
Case Manager
TAY Wraparound
Madeline Baker
Care Coordinator
Wraparound
Moriah Wolfe
Program Assistant
SF All-In 
Sara Ryugo
Support Counselor
Wraparound
Veronica Mayes
Lead HIS
QA

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

Community Process Group

The Connections Community Process Group (CPG) is a process space for staff to come together around challenging issues and discuss how these issues impact us both personally and in our work with youth, families, and communities. CPGs are held on the 3rd Thursday of every month as the second half of the All Staff-All Staff meeting (from 11:00AM-12:00PM). Any member of the SF Connections community can choose to facilitate a CPG or can suggest a topic for an upcoming CPG.


The CPG format arose from a tragic event that occurred in the summer of 2014. That summer, a community member who worked in The Village (known to Connections staff as "the Vis Valley office") was murdered. The process group was held in response in order to create a space for staff to discuss feelings and reactions, how to process the murder with youth and families, and how to gauge safety within the communities they were serving as providers.

A former AIIM Higher team member, Veronica Libre, is credited with building on that initial meeting and creating a monthly format for similar conversations to take place. As Veronica tells it, "I walked out of the process group feeling inspired... [I] felt it was much needed to speak about what goes on in our neighborhoods. Given that this group was not followed [up on] for some time, I felt that [it] was important to begin the process group again... and have it ongoing to build community awareness."

Beginning in April 2015, Veronica initiated the monthly CPG meeting at Connections. The mission of the project was to give staff a place to come together and focus on community-related issues from the local to the global. Over the course of its existence, CPG topics have included gentrification, gang culture, the school-to-prison pipeline, privilege, racial profiling, identity and belonging, labeling, family, grief and loss, election reactions, gun violence, and police misconduct.

Again from Veronica, "As providers we sometimes take a vantage point of reading and watching the news about these issues, while some of our clients feel the effects of the issues in their daily lives. The purpose of this process group is to bridge this gap and provide a space to talk about the impacts of our work in relation to these issues, and even how these issues impact our lives directly, in an open, safe, and respectful environment."

If you would like to suggest a topic for a future group or volunteer to facilitate one, please email the CORE team at SFcoreteam@senecacenter.org.

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

Employee Resource Groups

The SFA Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) bring together agency staff who share common aspects of their identity or life experiences. The goal of the ERGs is to promote increased engagement and to foster an inclusive work environment and networks of support related to the recruitment, retention, and professional development of various employees. Employee Resource Groups advance awareness and appreciation for the cultural diversity at SFA. Our employee resource groups help staff build relationships with one another and offer a community for employees to share common interests, aspirations and collaborate together.

Group Name
Facilitator
Agenda
Who Attends
African Diaspora
Desire Haynes
Reading and resource sharing 
Staff who identify from the African Diaspora (e.g African American, Black, American African, Caribbean, African, Afo-Latino, 
Asian Pacific Islander
Aiko Yano

Staff who identify from Asia or the Pacific Islands
Latin-X
Alicia Barron
Resource sharing and community building
Staff who identify from the colonized Spanish nation in the Americas (e.g. Chicanos, Central Americans, Southern Americans) and/or also native Spanish speakers gather to discuss the intersection of their blended identities. 
Learning Functioning
Alex Riley-Sorem
Tools to help manage learning differences on the job
Staff who seek tools and intervention to help manage/organize their work as a result of dyslexia or other executive functioning dynamics that impact work. 
Kaleidoscope
Anna Weitzman
Building community
Staff who identify as LGBTQIA can discuss topics related to their identity, create community in the work place, and discuss interventions to support clients/themselves in manners of this intersectionality.
Parenting
Pamella O’Connor

Sharing resources and processing impact of parenthood on working life
Parenting staff, staff who are thinking about parenting, or staff who are interested in caregiving issues.

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

Contact Us

Internal email: sfcoreteam@senecacenter.org

Response form (option to remain anonymous)

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Resources

Access a comprehensive list of resources and services local to the San Francisco area.

Thursday, July 26, 2018

Connections Equity Survey

In summer 2017, the CORE team administered a racial equity awareness survey to SF Connections staff.

The Why 
In alignment with our values of love and compassion, hope and courage, respect, curiosity and joy, we hope that this survey will allow us to increase our efforts to develop a diverse workforce that reflects the ethnic, cultural, and linguistic traditions of the children and families supported within our programs. This survey seeks to gather more information about our racial equity culture in order to increase our understanding of what our strengths, needs and areas of growth are and to inform our implementation of our diversity and inclusion initiatives. This survey is optional and we highly encourage every staff to thoughtfully and openly complete this survey questions to help us foster a culture that is welcoming and inclusive.

Definitions
Cultural Responsiveness:  Is a self and process-driven, lifelong commitment to a tailored, dialogue-based approach that responds to the needs being presented by the individual in front of the provider, within a contextual understanding of social/economic/political/linguistic disparities.
Source: https://www.nastad.org/webinars/practicing-cultural-responsiveness-health-care-deliverysettings

Racial Equity:  Racial equity is the condition that would be achieved if one's racial identity no longer predicted, in a statistical sense, how one fares. When we use the term, we are thinking about racial equity as one part of racial justice, and thus we also include work to address root causes of inequities, not just their manifestation. This includes elimination of policies, practices, attitudes and cultural messages that reinforce differential outcomes by race or fail to eliminate them.
Source: Center for Assessment and Policy Development

Survey Questions
1. Gender:
(Cis) Male
(Cis) Female
Transgender
Transgender Man
Transgender Woman
Genderqueer
Genderfluid
Two Spirits
Declined to State
Other (please specify)
2. Are you Hispanic and/or Latino?
Yes, Hispanic or Latino
No, not Hispanic or Latino
Declined to state

3. Race:
White American
Black or African American
Native American and Alaskan Native
Asian American
Middle Eastern and Arab American
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
Two or more races (Multiracial)
Declined to state
Other (please specify)
4. Age:
24 and younger
25 - 30 yrs old
31 - 36 yrs old
37 - 41 yrs old
42 - 50 yrs old
50 and older
Declined to state
5. What languages do you speak other than English?
Spanish
French
Tagalog
Cantonese
Russian
Arabic
Mandarin
Farsi
Vietnamese
German
Italian
Portuguese
American Signed Language (ASL)
None
Other (please specify)
6. What is your current position at San Francisco Connections?
Bachelor’s level direct care
Bachelor's level admin support
Master’s level direct care
Supervisor/Manager
Assistant Director/Director
Other (please specify)
7. Do you identify as a Mental Health Rehabilitation Specialist (MHRS)?
Yes
No
8. How long have you been in your current position?
Under a year
1-3 years
4-6 years
7+years
9. How long have you been at San Francisco Connections?
Under a year
1-3 years
4-6 years
7+years
10. How long have you been at Seneca Family of Agencies?
Under a year
1-3 years
4-6 years
7+years
11. How many promotions have you had since working at Seneca? (e.g. care coordinator to lead clinician, support counselor to MHRS)
0
1
2
3
4+
12. How many lateral changes of position have you experienced in Seneca?
0
1
2
3
4+
13. Does your supervisor speak with you about advancement opportunities?
Never
Seldom
Sometimes
Often
Always
14. I understand the pathway to promotion and professional development at Seneca SF Connections
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
15. How have you acquired your knowledge and skills that you found to be most relevant and useful to your work related to cultural and linguistic competence? (select the 3 most relevant options)
Academic curricula
Continuing education
Workshops/conferences
Employer sponsored training
On-the-job experiences
Living in diverse communities
Domestic/international travel
Culture within family of origin
16. I am trained in and have basic knowledge about racial inequities in general, including how they are produced, how they manifest, and how they may be reduced.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
17. I am trained in and have basic knowledge about racial inequities at SFC, including how they are produced, how they manifest, and how they may be reduced.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
18. In my role at SFC, I know what course of action to take if I witness or experience racial inequities taking place on a personal or institutional level in our workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
19. I am likely to take this course of action if I witness or experience racial or cultural * inequities at SFC.
Never
Seldom
Sometimes
Often
Always
20. I am comfortable and competent when it comes to discussing issues of racial inequity:
With my coworkers
With supervisors
On my team/in groups
At general trainings/all staff
21. I am trained and have basic knowledge about cultural responsive policies and practices at SFC?
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
22. Cultural responsiveness with diverse groups in the workplace is important to me.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
23. I exhibit cultural responsiveness in my interactions with racially diverse groups in the workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
24. The policies and practices at SFC take issues of racial inequity in the workplace * into consideration.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
25. The policies and practices at SFC take the needs of my racial identify group into consideration.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
26. I can understand and competently discuss the impact of racial inequities in the workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
27. I feel that SFC has explicitly stated their goal to reduce racial and cultural inequity in the workplace, and I can articulate that goal.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
28. SFC has a team explicitly working towards the goal of reducing racial and cultural inequity in the workplace, and I know how to access it.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
29. I feel that SFC allots resources toward the goal of reducing racial and cultural inequity in the workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
30. I feel that trainings and discussions facilitated by SFC are adequate and appropriate interventions addressing racial and cultural inequities in the workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know

31. I feel that SFC has a deliberate plan to develop and promote the leadership * of staff of color.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
32. SFC regularly assesses workforce composition by race and ethnicity and develops/implements strategies for creating diversity at all levels.
Never
Seldom
Sometimes
Often
Always
33. To what degree are the environments below culturally inclusive (ie: physical space, relevant check-in questions, trainings, discussions, holidays, etc).
With my coworkers
With supervisors
On my team/in groups
At general trainings/all staff
34. SFC has a mechanism in place to address complaints about barriers to opportunity and racial/cultural inequities in the workplace.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Don't Know
35. If so, what is it? Please describe.

36. Did you feel like you could answer this survey honestly?

37. Any additional feedback about the survey?